Common Systems Group (CSG)

Meeting

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

2:00 – 4:00 p.m.

2121 Murphy

 

 

AGENDA

 

 

1)      CALEA Update – Actions taken by UC (Jim Davis – 15 min)

 

This is an informational topic. Attached are comments submitted by Educause on behalf of the higher education coalition and the comments submitted separately by UC.

 

Attachments: 1) Higher Education Coalition CALEA Comments; 2) UC FCC CALEA Comments

 

2)      Minimum Security Standards (Kent Wada – 15 min)

 

UCLA Policy 401 is going through the last steps in formally becoming campus policy and is expected to be posted to the web around the first week of December. From the campuswide review in June and subsequent review by the administrative policies folks, the text has been edited for clarity and standard UCLA policy conventions (the content has not changed). Kent will briefly go over next steps for promulgating this policy campuswide, hear about implementation experiences you have had and update you on how the applied security task force is organizing to help.

 

Attachment: Final Minimum Security Standards for Network Devices

(Additional information about this policy will be emailed separately.)

 

3)      Review and Adjustment of the UCLA IT Governance Process (Jim Davis – 30 min)

 

UCLA has a review of the IT governance structure and process underway. The objective is to complete a self review of what is working and what needs to be improved. Included in the review is the overall board/committee structure, the role and input/decision responsibilities for each entity, the process by which a decision is made and the expected behavior of a board/committee/group in the context of a particular role. The purpose of this item on the CSG agenda is to go through an informational update on the status of the review, present several building recommendations that impact the CSG and initiate CSG’s review and comments, especially about itself.

Please note that we will not have advance materials for the meeting. We are still compiling reviews by each board/committee/group and the intent is to initiate the process by which we gather CSG’s input. Please also note that Tuesday’s meeting is intended to START the CSG discussion. Jim Davis will be seeking input via email after the Tuesday introduction.

 

 

 

Future Meetings

 

Tuesday

December 20

2:00 – 4:00

2121 Murphy